Re: [GENERAL] Efficiency of materialized views refresh in 9.3

2013-07-08 Thread Kevin Grittner
Michael Paquier wrote: > Joe Van Dyk wrote: >> Is refreshing a materialized view in 9.3 basically: >> >>   delete from mat_view; >>   insert into mat_view select * from base_view; > Nope. Here is some documentation: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/rules-materializedviews.html A RE

Re: [GENERAL] Efficiency of materialized views refresh in 9.3

2013-07-05 Thread Joe Van Dyk
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Joe Van Dyk wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is refreshing a materialized view in 9.3 basically: > > > > delete from mat_view; > > insert into mat_view select * from base_view; > Nope. Here is some documentation: >

Re: [GENERAL] Efficiency of materialized views refresh in 9.3

2013-07-04 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Joe Van Dyk wrote: > Hi, > > Is refreshing a materialized view in 9.3 basically: > > delete from mat_view; > insert into mat_view select * from base_view; Nope. Here is some documentation: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/rules-materializedviews.html

[GENERAL] Efficiency of materialized views refresh in 9.3

2013-07-04 Thread Joe Van Dyk
Hi, Is refreshing a materialized view in 9.3 basically: delete from mat_view; insert into mat_view select * from base_view; Or is it more efficient? If no rows have changed, will new tuples be written on a refresh? Joe