Re: [GENERAL] Effect of large text field data on queries

2006-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Glen Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How can I determine the default storage type for a given TOASTable > data type (text in this case)? Look in pg_type ... but they mostly default to "extended". regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)

Re: [GENERAL] Effect of large text field data on queries

2006-10-26 Thread Glen Parker
Tom Lane wrote: Glen Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: How much of a TOAST'd field is actually stored in the main heap table? Is there a way to configure that amount? A pushed-out-of-line value is replaced by a 20-byte pointer structure. There's no such thing as partially out-of-line. See ht

Re: [GENERAL] Effect of large text field data on queries

2006-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Glen Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How much of a TOAST'd field is actually stored in the main heap table? > Is there a way to configure that amount? A pushed-out-of-line value is replaced by a 20-byte pointer structure. There's no such thing as partially out-of-line. See http://www.postgr

Re: [GENERAL] Effect of large text field data on queries

2006-10-26 Thread Alan Hodgson
On Thursday 26 October 2006 12:51, Glen Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why would very large text values effect the speed of a seq scan that > does not actually evaluate those values? Seq scan reads the whole table. The limiting factor is the size of the table on disk. -- "If a nation expe

Re: [GENERAL] Effect of large text field data on queries

2006-10-26 Thread Glen Parker
Tom Lane wrote: Glen Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Why would very large text values effect the speed of a seq scan that does not actually evaluate those values? I'd actually suppose it's the smaller values (up to a few hundred bytes) that impact this the most. Really wide fields would be

Re: [GENERAL] Effect of large text field data on queries

2006-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Glen Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why would very large text values effect the speed of a seq scan that > does not actually evaluate those values? More bytes to scan over? Have you checked the physical table sizes? I'd actually suppose it's the smaller values (up to a few hundred bytes)

[GENERAL] Effect of large text field data on queries

2006-10-26 Thread Glen Parker
I am having some query problems on a table with large text fields. The table contains 6.7M rows. It is vacuumed every night, and since the last vacuum, rows have been inserted only, never updated or deleted. There are many large text field values in one text field, some in excess of 6MB. I