-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/07 01:28, Alex Turner wrote:
> Why the hell would you buy a 1U chassis in the first place when
> perfectly good cheap 4U chassis exists that will take 8 or more drives?
>
> 1U motherboards are a pain, 1U power supplies are a pain and 1U spa
Why the hell would you buy a 1U chassis in the first place when perfectly
good cheap 4U chassis exists that will take 8 or more drives?
1U motherboards are a pain, 1U power supplies are a pain and 1U space for
drives sucks.
Most tests I've seen these days show that there is very little actual
ben
On Nov 24, 2007, at 8:17 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/07 09:12, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Nov 24, 2007 5:09 AM, Clodoaldo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will build a cheap server and I'm in doubt about what would the
the
best for performance:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/07 09:12, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2007 5:09 AM, Clodoaldo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I will build a cheap server and I'm in doubt about what would the the
>> best for performance:
>>
>> 1 - everything in one lonely fast 10,000 rpm
On Nov 24, 2007 5:09 AM, Clodoaldo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will build a cheap server and I'm in doubt about what would the the
> best for performance:
>
> 1 - everything in one lonely fast 10,000 rpm Raptor HD;
>
> 2 - two cheap 7,200 rpm 16MB cache HDs like this:
>
> disk 1 - system and
Clodoaldo asked:
> I will build a cheap server and I'm in doubt about what would the the
> best for performance:
>
> 1 - everything in one lonely fast 10,000 rpm Raptor HD;
>
> 2 - two cheap 7,200 rpm 16MB cache HDs like this:
>
> disk 1 - system and pg_xlog
> disk 2 - pg_data without p
I will build a cheap server and I'm in doubt about what would the the
best for performance:
1 - everything in one lonely fast 10,000 rpm Raptor HD;
2 - two cheap 7,200 rpm 16MB cache HDs like this:
disk 1 - system and pg_xlog
disk 2 - pg_data without pg_xlog
or a better arrange sugge
