On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:40 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Chris Bandy
> wrote:
>
>> I would like to create a new type for version strings that sorts
>> numerically. The composite type below was quick to write and does not
>> require superuser privileges
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Chris Bandy wrote:
> I would like to create a new type for version strings that sorts
> numerically. The composite type below was quick to write and does not
> require superuser privileges. However, it doesn't respond to type casts the
> way I'd like.
>
> Is there
I would like to create a new type for version strings that sorts
numerically. The composite type below was quick to write and does not
require superuser privileges. However, it doesn't respond to type casts the
way I'd like.
Is there a way to implement this type's literal conversion without
resort
