On 5/24/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It sounds like you have a reproducible test case --- can you make it
available to someone else?
Not very easily, Tom. The tarball files are around 35 GB (uncompressed)
and I assume they'd only work on a fairly similar system anyway.
I assume s
"Michael Nolan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Howevever, when I go to access one table, the index appears to be corrupted
> because the record I get for one query doesn't match the record key I give.
> Reindexing that table on the warm spare system fixes the problem.
> I redid setting up the warm
Sorry, I meant 8.2.4 (darn typo virus)
On 5/24/07, Michael Nolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Recently I went through the steps to refresh the database (8.3.4) on my
development server (running Fedora Core 5 Linux),
making a tarball of the live database, then restoring it on the
development serve
Recently I went through the steps to refresh the database (8.3.4) on my
development server (running Fedora Core 5 Linux),
making a tarball of the live database, then restoring it on the development
server, and running all the archived WAL files.
Everything worked fine as far as I can tell, I don'
