On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:37:30AM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:54:02PM -0700, Don Y wrote:
> > I assumed that the contents of ./contrib have NOT been
> > thoroughly tested/reviewed by the Postgres team (though
> > that is just an impression I have... i.e. why h
On Friday 19 May 2006 01:54, Don Y wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Tim Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Don Y wrote:
> >>> So, I'll deploy them and get feedback on which features I
> >>> may need to add (some of the data types are probably a bit
> >>> too exotic for most users). I figure I can
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:54:02PM -0700, Don Y wrote:
> I assumed that the contents of ./contrib have NOT been
> thoroughly tested/reviewed by the Postgres team (though
> that is just an impression I have... i.e. why have those
> features not been INTEGRATED into the codebase?)
contrib has been t
Tom Lane wrote:
Tim Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Don Y wrote:
So, I'll deploy them and get feedback on which features I
may need to add (some of the data types are probably a bit
too exotic for most users). I figure I can always contribute
them just before a release...
Just before a rel
Tim Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don Y wrote:
>> So, I'll deploy them and get feedback on which features I
>> may need to add (some of the data types are probably a bit
>> too exotic for most users). I figure I can always contribute
>> them just before a release...
> Just before a release
Don Y wrote:
So, I'll deploy them and get feedback on which features I
may need to add (some of the data types are probably a bit
too exotic for most users). I figure I can always contribute
them just before a release...
Just before a release would actually be a bad time to contribute the
co
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:46:52AM -0700, Don Y wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> >On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:12:05PM -0700, Don Y wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Is it possible to have one of my user defined data types
> >>reviewed/critiqued to see if there are things that I am
> >>not doing proper
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:12:05PM -0700, Don Y wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to have one of my user defined data types
reviewed/critiqued to see if there are things that I am
not doing properly? Or, other things that I should be
including? Or, should I just contribu
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:12:05PM -0700, Don Y wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have one of my user defined data types
> reviewed/critiqued to see if there are things that I am
> not doing properly? Or, other things that I should be
> including? Or, should I just contribute it and hope
> for
Hi,
Is it possible to have one of my user defined data types
reviewed/critiqued to see if there are things that I am
not doing properly? Or, other things that I should be
including? Or, should I just contribute it and hope
for the best? (if so, how do I do that?)
Thanks!
--don
--
10 matches
Mail list logo