On Monday 29 March 2004 05:24 pm, Dann Corbit wrote:
> Of course I meant that is contained in "vacuumlo" --> stupid spell
I have never worked with large objects in postgresql and I have no idea what
is different with vacuumlo. Suggestions or thoughts anyone?
Matthew
---
Title: Message
Is there any
functionality contained in vacuum that is
not contained in pg_autovacuum?
Suggestion:
Modify the
base schema for tables and add a timestamp column for the last vacuum
operation, and a timestamp for the last vacuum analyze. Finally, a
timestamp for the last tim
Of course I meant that is contained in "vacuumlo" --> stupid spell
checker auto-corrected it.
-Original Message-
From: Dann Corbit
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 2:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Contrib question
Is there any functionality contained in vacuum that is not contained in
