Re: [GENERAL] Column qualifier issue

2004-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, I think you are correct on that. I was misreading column reference for > column name. Would it be difficult to patch my local copy to either permit > this or strip off the characters from the qualifier portion in the parser? [shrug...] You could p

Re: [GENERAL] Column qualifier issue

2004-01-12 Thread Jim Wilson
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > "Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > As far as I can tell, there isn't a way to get postgresql to accept column > > qualifiers (e.g. tablenames). A 'parse error at or near "."' gets returned. > > You're either very confused or using a *very* old versi

Re: [GENERAL] Column qualifier issue

2004-01-12 Thread Jim Wilson
Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > > > "Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > As far as I can tell, there isn't a way to get postgresql to accept column > > > qualifiers (e.g. tablenames). A 'parse error at or near "."' gets returned. > > > >