On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Ben wrote:
On Dec 26, 2006, at 7:30 AM, Marc Evans wrote:
What I have not been able to come up with a good semi-general purpose
solution to is cross-data-center HA.
Why does log shipping not work for you?
Well, it may, but is short, I believe that this comes down to
On Dec 26, 2006, at 7:30 AM, Marc Evans wrote:
What I have not been able to come up with a good semi-general
purpose solution to is cross-data-center HA.
Why does log shipping not work for you?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/readi
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Shoaib Mir wrote:
We are trying to achieve High Availability over load balancing, so
basically we always try and have 2 databases in the same state while >>both
are active,
What problems do you see with Slony + Linux HA combo there? I think a Slony
failover can do the sam
hoaib Mir
> > > > > > > EnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 12/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > >
On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 15:11 +, Andy Dale wrote:
> ...
You guys please avoid top-posting.
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plP
12/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Chris,
> > > > > > > I see you a core member of Slony team and a replication guru
> > > > > > > so I'll look
> >
hanks Chris,
> > > > > > I see you a core member of Slony team and a replication guru
> > > > > > so I'll look
> > > > > > into it.
> > > > > > I'm not slamming Slony I think its p
ably the right tool for
> > > > > type of work
> > > > > your company Afilias does. Just wish you would make an official
> > > > > Windows
> > > > > version of Slony as well.
> > > > > Anyway thanks for the education, and I
t; > > > version of Slony as well.
> > > > Anyway thanks for the education, and I think it would be a good
> > > > thing if
> > > > your site on replication, was also listed on Postgresql... good
> > > > research.
> > > > Merry Xmas
gt; Windows
> > > version of Slony as well.
> > > Anyway thanks for the education, and I think it would be a good
> > > thing if
> > > your site on replication, was also listed on Postgresql... good
> > > research.
> > > Merry Xmas
> &
research.
> > Merry Xmas
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Christopher Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: < pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 4:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Clustering & Lo
esearch.
> Merry Xmas
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 4:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Clustering & Load Balancing & Replication
>
>
> > Centuries ago,
"Christopher Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 4:23 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Clustering & Load Balancing & Replication
> Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] would write:
>> Suggest you download my little applicatio
: Re: [GENERAL] Clustering & Load Balancing & Replication
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] would write:
Suggest you download my little application and read the documentation,
you'll see its very different, maybe even interesting.
Maybe they should change that
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] would write:
> Suggest you download my little application and read the documentation,
> you'll see its very different, maybe even interesting.
> Maybe they should change that to Postgres DOES HAVE a free multi-master
> replication system
tastic.
I will use nothing else
Thanks, Johnny
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Clustering & Load Balancing & Replication
I assume you have read this new documentation for 8.2:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/high-availability.html
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am currently investigating the preferred method of
>Hi,
>
>I am currently investigating the preferred method of clustering a postgresql
>database on Redhat?
>
>i would really appreciate some suggestions or experiences you guys have had.
>
>note: performance & redundancy are both equally desirable and i have plenty of
>resources.
>
>we already
18 matches
Mail list logo
