On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 06:34:03PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 10:02 -0400, Brad Nicholson wrote:
> > I just want to confirm that the cluster/MVCC issues are due to
> > transaction visibility. Assuming that no concurrent access is happening
> > to a given table when the clust
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 10:02 -0400, Brad Nicholson wrote:
> I just want to confirm that the cluster/MVCC issues are due to
> transaction visibility. Assuming that no concurrent access is happening
> to a given table when the cluster command is issued (when takes it
> visibility snapshot), it is saf
I just want to confirm that the cluster/MVCC issues are due to
transaction visibility. Assuming that no concurrent access is happening
to a given table when the cluster command is issued (when takes it
visibility snapshot), it is safe to cluster that table. Correct?
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-41
