Hi Bruce.Didn't catch that in the announcement.Thanks for clearing out the confusion.Best regards,Mads
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 06:39:22PM +0200, mads.tand...@schneider-electric.com
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I'm trying to understand the implications of the latest security fix to
> postgresql [1].
>
> We have a setup were we in pg_hba.conf have limited the allowed IP addresses
> of
> the clients. But do
Hi,
pg_hba.conf does not have protection for this security issue.
Regards, Devrim
mads.tand...@schneider-electric.com wrote:
>Hi All
>
>
>I'm trying to understand the implications of the latest security fix to
>postgresql [1].
>
>
>We have a setup were we in pg_hba.conf have limited the allowed
Hi AllI'm trying to understand the implications of the latest security fix to postgresql [1].We have a setup were we in pg_hba.conf have limited the allowed IP addresses of the clients. But does anyone know if CVE-2013-1899 allows an arbitrary attacker to use the exploits described in [1]?We are us
