el dorado wrote:
Hello.
Thank you very much for your answer.
1>d:\pgsql83\getstring\c_getstring.c(10) : warning C4273: 'Pg_magic_func' :
inconsistent dll linkage
1>d:\pgsql83\getstring\c_getstring.c(10) : see previous definition of
'Pg_magic_func'
This should be a big red fla
Hello.
Thank you very much for your answer.
I found an option "Configuration Properties\C/C++/General/Detect 64-bit
Portability Issues". It was set to 'Yes'. I made it 'No'.
Now I don't get these warnings about 'type cast'.
The result:
1>Compiling...
1>getstring.c
1>d:\pgsql83\getstring\
el dorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (By the way, I can't compile it as C++ Code (/TP)
No, you can't.
> 1>d:\pgsql83\getstring\c_getstring.c(75) : warning C4311: 'type cast' :
> pointer truncation from 'char [8]' to 'Datum'
> 1>d:\pgsql83\getstring\c_getstring.c(75) : warning C4312: 'type cas
Hello.
I'm trying to create a C-procedure returning text variable - again :).
Postgres 8.3.3 (standard binaries - so built by means of MSVC), WinXP SP2.
I also use MSVC 2005 for compilation my library.
Configuration type - Dynamic Library (.dll)
Additional include directories -
D:\pgsql83\include;
I download ready binaries from
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/v8.3.3/win32/
(postgresql-8.3.3-1-binaries-no-installer.zip)
So I didn't know exactly which compilier was used.
Are these binaries built by means of MSVC?
Regards, Marina.
> el dorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'd like to
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Craig Ringer wrote:
That said, PostgreSQL does appear to use its own allocator for memory
passed across library boundaries, and if it doesn't pass any FILE
pointers across library boundaries either then that's the worst two
problems that arise with a C runtime mismatc
Craig Ringer wrote:
> That said, PostgreSQL does appear to use its own allocator for memory
> passed across library boundaries, and if it doesn't pass any FILE
> pointers across library boundaries either then that's the worst two
> problems that arise with a C runtime mismatch taken care of.
Tom Lane wrote:
el dorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'd like to write C-function returning text for using in PG 8.3.3. (WinXP SP2)
For compilation I use MinGW-5.1.4 (gcc 3.4.5),MSYS-1.0.10.
Was the Postgres server you're using built the same way? I seem to
recall some incompatibilities betw
el dorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to write C-function returning text for using in PG 8.3.3. (WinXP SP2)
> For compilation I use MinGW-5.1.4 (gcc 3.4.5),MSYS-1.0.10.
Was the Postgres server you're using built the same way? I seem to
recall some incompatibilities between MinGW and MS
Hello!
I'd like to write C-function returning text for using in PG 8.3.3. (WinXP SP2)
For compilation I use MinGW-5.1.4 (gcc 3.4.5),MSYS-1.0.10.
The code looks like this (in reduced variant):
#include "postgres.h"
#include "fmgr.h"
#include "executor/executor.h"
#include "utils/timestamp.h"
#incl
10 matches
Mail list logo
