Jorge Arevalo writes:
> BTW, this code is for WKT Raster. A PostGIS extension. We can use the
> memory context I said (fcinfo->flinfo->fn_mcxt) to allocate memory
> when we need to call one of our functions from a standard "version 1"
> function, but is this the right context? I mean, the context
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Jorge Arevalo
> wrote:
>> Is this a good way of doing it? Is it possible? And another small
>> question: if the memory for my array of structs is allocated inside
>> the function that provides me the array, s
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Jorge Arevalo
wrote:
> Is this a good way of doing it? Is it possible? And another small
> question: if the memory for my array of structs is allocated inside
> the function that provides me the array, should I deallocate it in the
> SRF? Using pfree? It wasn't all
Hello,
I need to code a set-returning function, but it's my first time, and
I'm not sure if my point is the right one. I'd like to know your
opinion:
My function will return an array of structs. Then, In the first call
(SRF_IS_FIRSTCALL() is true), I get the array from another function.
For the n
