Re: [GENERAL] Attempting to do a rolling move to 9.2Beta (as a slave) fails

2012-05-28 Thread Karl Denninger
On 5/28/2012 11:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Karl Denninger writes: >> I am attempting to validate the path forward to 9.2, and thus tried the >> following: >> 1. Build 9.2Beta1; all fine. >> 2. Run a pg_basebackup from the current master machine (running 9.1) to >> a new directory on the slave machin

Re: [GENERAL] Attempting to do a rolling move to 9.2Beta (as a slave) fails

2012-05-28 Thread Tom Lane
Karl Denninger writes: > I am attempting to validate the path forward to 9.2, and thus tried the > following: > 1. Build 9.2Beta1; all fine. > 2. Run a pg_basebackup from the current master machine (running 9.1) to > a new directory on the slave machine, using the 9.2Beta1 pg_basebackup > execut

Re: [GENERAL] Attempting to do a rolling move to 9.2Beta (as a slave) fails

2012-05-27 Thread Karl Denninger
On 5/27/2012 11:08 PM, Jan Nielsen wrote: > Hi Karl, > > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Karl Denninger > wrote: > > Here's what I'm trying to do in testing 9.2Beta1. > > The current configuration is a master and a hot standby at a > diverse location for bot

Re: [GENERAL] Attempting to do a rolling move to 9.2Beta (as a slave) fails

2012-05-27 Thread Jan Nielsen
Hi Karl, On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Karl Denninger wrote: > Here's what I'm trying to do in testing 9.2Beta1. > > The current configuration is a master and a hot standby at a diverse > location for both hot swap and "online" backup. Both are archived > regularly so if something goes sout

[GENERAL] Attempting to do a rolling move to 9.2Beta (as a slave) fails

2012-05-27 Thread Karl Denninger
Here's what I'm trying to do in testing 9.2Beta1. The current configuration is a master and a hot standby at a diverse location for both hot swap and "online" backup. Both are archived regularly so if something goes south I can recover (to either as a master.) I am attempting to validate the pat