On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Chris
Barnes wrote:
> You assistance is appreciated.
>
> I have question regarding disk storage for postgres servers
>
> We are thinking long term about scalable storage and performance and would
> like some advise or feedback about what other people are using.
>
> W
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 11:15 -0400, Chris Barnes wrote:
>
> We would like to get as much performance from our file systems
> as possible.
Then avoid RAID 5. Raid 10 is a pretty good option for most loads.
Actually, RAID 5 is quite decent for read-mostly large volume stor
No other takers on this one?
I'm wondering what exactly "direct attached storage" entails?
At PG Con I heard a lot about using only direct-attached storage, and not a SAN.
Are there numbers to back this up?
Does fibre-channel count as direct-attached storage? I'm thinking it would.
What exact
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Chris
Barnes wrote:
> We are curious about using SAN with fiber channel hba and if anyone else
> uses this technology.
>
> We would also like to know if people have preference to the level of raid
> with/out striping.
I used SurfRAID Triton external RAID units conn
You assistance is appreciated.
I have question regarding disk
storage for postgres servers
We are thinking long term about
scalable storage and performance and would like some advise
or feedback about
what other people are using.
We would like to get as much
performance from our file s
