Bob Pawley wrote:
I am seeking wording for a procedure that will initiate a trigger only
after another trigger has completed its function. In this case I want to
drop a table that is created and used by the first trigger.
You could just call a function from your trigger, or handle it inside
On 22/9/2006 2:14, "Bob Pawley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am seeking wording for a procedure that will initiate a trigger only after
> another trigger has completed its function. In this case I want to drop a
> table that is created and used by the first trigger.
Sounds like you should use a
On Thursday 21 September 2006 12:44 pm, Bob Pawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thus
communicated:
--> I am seeking wording for a procedure that will initiate a trigger only
after another trigger has completed its function. In this case I want to
drop a table that is created and used by the first trigger
I am seeking wording for a procedure that will initiate a
trigger only after another trigger has completed its function. In this case I
want to drop a table that is created and used by the first
trigger.
Could someone point me to documentation?
Bob Pawley
From: "Feite Brekeveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Feite Brekeveld wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have put an AFTER INSERT TRIGGER on a table.
> > >
> > > If the triggerfunction fails to do an operation shouldn't the insert
> > > already have taken