On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Marco Bizzarri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Berend Tober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The way I understand the documentation at
>>
>> "http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/transaction-iso.html";
>>
>> and
>>
>> 'http://www.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Berend Tober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The way I understand the documentation at
>
> "http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/transaction-iso.html";
>
> and
>
> 'http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/explicit-locking.html',
>
> you should not have to
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:11 PM, David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 09:23:31AM +0200, Marco Bizzarri wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I need to keep a numer of counters in my application; my counters
>> are currently stored in a table:
>>
>> name | next_value | year
>>
>> The c
Marco Bizzarri wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I need to keep a numer of counters in my application; my
counters are
> currently stored in a table:
>
> name | next_value | year
>
>
> The counters must be progressive numbers with no holes in between
> them, and they must restart from 1 every year. What I've
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 09:23:31AM +0200, Marco Bizzarri wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I need to keep a numer of counters in my application; my counters
> are currently stored in a table:
>
> name | next_value | year
>
> The counters must be progressive numbers with no holes in between
> them, and they m
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Craig Ringer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco Bizzarri wrote:
>> Thanks for the advice, Craig.
>>
>> I'm on a number of different PostgreSQL versions, ranging from 7.4 to
>> 8.3, so I've to retain, where possible, compatibility with older
>> versions.
>>
>> Is thi
Marco Bizzarri wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, Craig.
>
> I'm on a number of different PostgreSQL versions, ranging from 7.4 to
> 8.3, so I've to retain, where possible, compatibility with older
> versions.
>
> Is this better on a transaction/serialization point of view?
As far as I know it's no
Thanks for the advice, Craig.
I'm on a number of different PostgreSQL versions, ranging from 7.4 to
8.3, so I've to retain, where possible, compatibility with older
versions.
Is this better on a transaction/serialization point of view?
Regards
Marco
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Craig Ringer
Marco Bizzarri wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I need to keep a numer of counters in my application; my counters are
> currently stored in a table:
>
> name | next_value | year
>
>
> The counters must be progressive numbers with no holes in between
> them, and they must restart from 1 every year. What I'v
Hi all.
I need to keep a numer of counters in my application; my counters are
currently stored in a table:
name | next_value | year
The counters must be progressive numbers with no holes in between
them, and they must restart from 1 every year. What I've done so far
is to access them while in S
10 matches
Mail list logo
