Andy M wrote:
> ALERT
>
> There is a person by the name of Mike Cox who's trying
> to turn this mailing list into a Big-8 newsgroup.
No, I'm trying to get teh postgresql groups which are already ON usenet to
follow proper usenet guidelines. In order to be under the comp.* hierarchy
the server
At 08:29 AM 11/6/2004, edward ohare wrote:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:42:40 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy M)
wrote:
>ALERT
>
>There is a person by the name of Mike Cox who's trying
>to turn this mailing list into a Big-8 newsgroup. Many
>of you know that this and most of the other postresql
>mail
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:42:40 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy M)
wrote:
>ALERT
>
>There is a person by the name of Mike Cox who's trying
>to turn this mailing list into a Big-8 newsgroup. Many
>of you know that this and most of the other postresql
>mailing lists are already gated to Google Grou
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Steve Atkins wrote:
There may be significant pressure to change the gateway to a two-way
gateway, sending all usenet posts to the mailing list, as part of the
"doing the paperwork" process. That may cause problems. On the other
hand without the full two-way gateway there's a
(All as I understand it. If Marc or someone else who's involved wants
to correct and clarify it'd be appreciated.)
This mailing list is already gatewayed to
comp.databases.postgresql.general (that's where the spammers harvest
your email address if you post to the list).
This is nothing new. It ha
ALERT
There is a person by the name of Mike Cox who's trying
to turn this mailing list into a Big-8 newsgroup. Many
of you know that this and most of the other postresql
mailing lists are already gated to Google Groups and a
small number of private news servers. If Mike Cox
succeeds, this list wil
