OpenMacNews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The short answer seems to be "when you update to 10.4, don't forget to
update to Xcode 2 as well".
does it make sense to have configure check for min req'ts of xcode2 if os >=
v10.4?
No, I don't think so. There is such an astonishing variety of ways to
brea
OpenMacNews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The short answer seems to be "when you update to 10.4, don't forget to
>> update to Xcode 2 as well".
> does it make sense to have configure check for min req'ts of xcode2 if os >=
> v10.4?
No, I don't think so. There is such an astonishing variety of
hi tom,
OpenMacNews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
reading here, it seems builds on 'virgin' Tiger are behaving themselves ...
The short answer seems to be "when you update to 10.4, don't forget to
update to Xcode 2 as well".
regards, tom lane
does it make sense to have configure check for min req'
OpenMacNews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> reading here, it seems builds on 'virgin' Tiger are behaving themselves ...
The short answer seems to be "when you update to 10.4, don't forget to
update to Xcode 2 as well".
regards, tom lane
---(end of br
hi all,
reading here, it seems builds on 'virgin' Tiger are behaving themselves ...
just fyi & fwiw, a pgsql v803 build on OSX 10.4.1 is also very nicely tolerant
of a /usr/local mod'd system, resulting in:
% otool -L /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres:
/usr/lib/libSyste
I also thought I saw quite a few more warnings this time than in the
past.
-M@
On May 19, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Jerry LeVan wrote:
For what it is worth...
I have 10.4.1 (Tiger) (archived and ) installed on my
old 933MHZ QuickSiver.
I also have Xcode 2.0 installed.
When I compiled 8.0.3 it seemed
For what it is worth...
I have 10.4.1 (Tiger) (archived and ) installed on my
old 933MHZ QuickSiver.
I also have Xcode 2.0 installed.
When I compiled 8.0.3 it seemed to generated many more
warnings with 4.0 gcc than the older 3.3 gcc. At least
that is my recollection...
I have installed the rascal
On May 19, 2005, at 9:27 AM, Jeff Trout wrote:
On May 18, 2005, at 9:27 PM, Matthew Hixson wrote:
/usr/bin/libtool: for architecture: cputype (16777234) cpusubtype
(0) file: -lSystem is not an object file (not allowed in a library)
I had some issues with this error on a few other things on my T
On May 18, 2005, at 9:27 PM, Matthew Hixson wrote:
/usr/bin/libtool: for architecture: cputype (16777234) cpusubtype
(0) file: -lSystem is not an object file (not allowed in a library)
I had some issues with this error on a few other things on my Tiger box.
After I installed Xcode2 things worked
On May 19, 2005, at 5:42 AM, John DeSoi wrote:
On May 19, 2005, at 1:34 AM, Matthew Hixson wrote:
/usr/bin/libtool: for architecture: cputype (16777234) cpusubtype
(0) file: -lSystem is not an object file (not allowed in a library)
After upgrading to 10.4.1 and using Michael's parameters to ./
On May 19, 2005, at 1:34 AM, Matthew Hixson wrote:
/usr/bin/libtool: for architecture: cputype (16777234) cpusubtype (0)
file: -lSystem is not an object file (not allowed in a library)
After upgrading to 10.4.1 and using Michael's parameters to
./configure I still get the exact same build error.
On May 19, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On May 19, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Matthew Hixson wrote:
8.0.3 does not build for me on Mac OS X 10.4. Anyone else seeing
this error, and will it be fixed in the next release?
I just built 8.0.3 on Mac OS X 10
On May 18, 2005, at 8:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On May 19, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Matthew Hixson wrote:
8.0.3 does not build for me on Mac OS X 10.4. Anyone else seeing
this error, and will it be fixed in the next release?
I just built 8.0.3 on Mac OS X 10.
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On May 19, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Matthew Hixson wrote:
>> 8.0.3 does not build for me on Mac OS X 10.4. Anyone else seeing
>> this error, and will it be fixed in the next release?
> I just built 8.0.3 on Mac OS X 10.4.1 just fine.
IIRC this isn't t
On May 19, 2005, at 10:48 AM, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On May 19, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Matthew Hixson wrote:
8.0.3 does not build for me on Mac OS X 10.4. Anyone else seeing
this error, and will it be fixed in the next release?
I just built 8.0.3 on Mac OS X 10.4.1 just fine. I installed
biso
On May 19, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Matthew Hixson wrote:
8.0.3 does not build for me on Mac OS X 10.4. Anyone else seeing
this error, and will it be fixed in the next release?
I just built 8.0.3 on Mac OS X 10.4.1 just fine. I installed
bison-1.875 (simple ./configure, make, sudo make install) befo
8.0.3 does not build for me on Mac OS X 10.4. Anyone else seeing
this error, and will it be fixed in the next release?
Thanks,
-M@
gcc -no-cpp-precomp -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -
Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -DFRONTEND -I. -I../../../src/
include -I../../../s
17 matches
Mail list logo
