Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 questions

2004-10-15 Thread David Garamond
Vivek Khera wrote: "GS" == Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GS> David Garamond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GS> Another reason to move to 7.4.5 would be that each version GS> introduced changes in behaviour. You're going to be dealing with GS> minor headaches from things like '' not being a va

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 questions

2004-10-14 Thread Vivek Khera
> "GS" == Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GS> David Garamond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GS> Another reason to move to 7.4.5 would be that each version GS> introduced changes in behaviour. You're going to be dealing with GS> minor headaches from things like '' not being a valid integer

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 questions

2004-10-08 Thread Greg Stark
David Garamond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We have a lot of 7.2.5 versions running which badly needs an update, but > > if version 8.0.0 comes in the near future, we could surely hold out a > > while longer and go for the top of the line. > > Unless you need a specific feature of 8.0 (savepo

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 questions

2004-10-08 Thread Gaetano Mendola
David Garamond wrote: Thomas Madsen wrote: A quite impressive list of changes in version 8.0.0. ... But the question from me is: When is it done? Two words: Nobody knows. Beta cycle is usually at least 2-3 months. First beta is in Aug. So a release is probably Nov at the earliest. We have a lot

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 questions

2004-10-08 Thread David Garamond
Thomas Madsen wrote: A quite impressive list of changes in version 8.0.0. ... But the question from me is: When is it done? Two words: Nobody knows. Beta cycle is usually at least 2-3 months. First beta is in Aug. So a release is probably Nov at the earliest. We have a lot of 7.2.5 versions runn

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 questions

2004-10-08 Thread Thomas Madsen
r 2004 04:04 > To: Robby Russell > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 questions > > > Robby Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 14:48 -0400, Artem Litvinovich wrote: > >> I would like to know

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 questions

2004-10-07 Thread Tom Lane
Robby Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 14:48 -0400, Artem Litvinovich wrote: >> I would like to know what are the significant changes and new features >> introduced in Postgres 8.0 which warranted the major version number >> increment. > I think that if you look in the p

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 questions

2004-10-07 Thread Robby Russell
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 14:48 -0400, Artem Litvinovich wrote: > Dear postgres community, > > I would like to know what are the significant changes and new features > introduced in Postgres 8.0 which warranted the major version number > increment. From the postres website it is not very clear as I

[GENERAL] 8.0 questions

2004-10-07 Thread Artem Litvinovich
Dear postgres community, I would like to know what are the significant changes and new features introduced in Postgres 8.0 which warranted the major version number increment. From the postres website it is not very clear as I can only find technical changelogs for the beta releases. //Artem ---