Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-30 Thread Edgars Diebelis
---From: Edgars Diebelis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 28, 2004 5:41 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!   Hallo, I have the same problem as you:   I had install PostgreSQL 8.0 RC2. Remote clien

[GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-30 Thread Nicolas COUSSEMACQ
I can't find any solution. Is it a bug or a config problem ? ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-30 Thread Peter Lang
Yes, this is exactly the same behaviour as mine. I've also seen the exact same entries in the log file (tested this last night). Many, many of these entries spanning only a couple of seconds. Does anyone have any ideas I can try to rectify this problem? Thanks, Peter -Original Message---

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-28 Thread Magnus Hagander
: December 28, 2004 5:41 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!   Hallo, I have the same problem as you:   I had install PostgreSQL 8.0 RC2. Remote clients connect to databese, so I have to set listen_addresses = '

FW: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-28 Thread A. Mous
:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!   Hallo, I have the same problem as you:   I had install PostgreSQL 8.0 RC2. Remote clients connect to databese, so I have to set listen_addresses = '*' in the posrgresql.conf file. Afte

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-24 Thread A. Mous
Yes, this is exactly the same behaviour as mine. I've also seen the exact same entries in the log file (tested this last night). Many, many of these entries spanning only a couple of seconds. Does anyone have any ideas I can try to rectify this problem? Thanks, Peter -Original Message--

[GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-24 Thread Nicolas COUSSEMACQ
I have the same problem ! When I setup Postgres 8.0 Beta 4 on a Windows Xp or 2003 Server, it works parfectly with parameter listen_adresses set to '*' or localhost. I have been testing Beta5, RC1 and RC2 on my XP workstation and there is no problem, event if I accept external connections ( listen

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-22 Thread A. Mous
ROTECTED] Sent: December 22, 2004 10:50 AM To: A. Mous; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: RE: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't! Ok, then the problem has nothing to do with SSL. IIRC, you get this error message if you have SSL support compiled in (which the MSI version does) and get a

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-22 Thread Magnus Hagander
your server log should point at what the actual issue is. //Magnus > -Original Message- > From: A. Mous [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 5:41 PM > To: Magnus Hagander; pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 d

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-22 Thread Tom Lane
"A. Mous" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I didn't change the SSL settings from default, so I believe it should not be > using it. Nope, the default libpq behavior is "prefer SSL", so it will try an SSL connection first ... if it is compiled to support SSL, which I believe was not true in the beta3

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-22 Thread A. Mous
d let you know how it went. Also, Beta5 exhibited the same behaviour as RC1! -Original Message- From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 22, 2004 3:05 AM To: A. Mous; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't! > Hi all, >

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-22 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Was there a change affecting client certificate handling a couple > of months ago? Yes, but it was pre-beta3. However, this being on Windows ... I don't think the SSL code was enabled at all in the Windows port as of beta3. I find this post-beta3 CVS lo

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-22 Thread Magnus Hagander
> Hi all, > > I'm using psql 8.0.0 on a client's site who's running win server 2003. > We've had him on beta 3 for some time, and no problems at all > (yes, in a sense, he is a beta tester as well, but doesn't > know it!). Today I tried to upgrade the db to RC1 and had > some problems. > > Re

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-21 Thread A. Mous
Original Message- From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 21, 2004 8:06 PM To: A. Mous Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't! A. Mous wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm using psql 8.0.0 on a client's site who&

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-21 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:06:00PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > The clients connecting remotely... do they support SSL? It looks > like to me that you have ssl enabled. I would check the pg_hba.conf > and the postgresql.conf for your ssl configuration. Was there a change affecting client certi

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-21 Thread Joshua D. Drake
A. Mous wrote: Hi all, I'm using psql 8.0.0 on a client's site who's running win server 2003. We've had him on beta 3 for some time, and no problems at all (yes, in a sense, he is a beta tester as well, but doesn't know it!). Today I tried to upgrade the db to RC1 and had some problems. Remote cli

[GENERAL] 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!

2004-12-21 Thread A. Mous
Hi all, I'm using psql 8.0.0 on a client's site who's running win server 2003. We've had him on beta 3 for some time, and no problems at all (yes, in a sense, he is a beta tester as well, but doesn't know it!). Today I tried to upgrade the db to RC1 and had some problems. Remote clients connect