On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:35:02 -0300 (ART), Clodoaldo Pinto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made the same experience now with PG 8.01, FC3 and 512MB memory. The
> previous
> was PG 7.4.6, FC2 and 1GB.
>
> The difference in performance between kernels 2.6.9-1.724 and 2.6.10-1.766 is
> still huge.
>
I made the same experience now with PG 8.01, FC3 and 512MB memory. The previous
was PG 7.4.6, FC2 and 1GB.
The difference in performance between kernels 2.6.9-1.724 and 2.6.10-1.766 is
still huge.
I notice that in 2.6.10 the function accesses the disk much more.
Does anyone know what changes fro
Just tried 2.6.10-1.9_FC2 with the same bad results.
Am I the only one experiencing this? What would be special? The hardware? It
has nothing special, a popular Asus motherboard, 1GB memory, a modern Maxtor HD
and nothing else.
Clodoaldo
--- Clodoaldo Pinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> 31 m
31 minutes in 2.6.10-1.8:
select kstime(), update_ranking_usuarios(), kstime();
kstime| update_ranking_usuarios | kstime
-+-+-
2005-01-13 20:27:56 | | 2005-01-13 20:58:46
(1 row)
5 minute
