Philipp Buehler wrote:
On 22/04/2004, Guy Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote To [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Shouldn't the Database server be the entity that decides when vacuum is
needed?
How is the database supposed to know when you want to purge records?
Once a vacuum has been run, the table can n
Dann Corbit wrote:
A following VACCUM brings back return times to 'start' -
but I cannot
run VACUUM any other minute (?). And it exactly vaccums as
many tuples
as I updated.. sure thing:
Why not? You only have to vacuum this one table. Vacuuming it
once a minute
Hello,
postgresql 7.3.4 on Debian or the redhat packaged 7.3.4-8 on RHEL AS3 -
same issue, so I somewhat cut out RH is playing things on me.
Tested on two different PCs, too (say, one debian, one RHEL).
While running
UPDATE banner SET counterhalf=counterhalf+1 WHERE BannerID=50
several thousand t