Re: [GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas

2004-11-16 Thread Richard_D_Levine
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/16/2004 11:08 Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas

Re: [GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas

2004-11-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Tino Wildenhain wrote: Hi, On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 14:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Chris and Karim, I haven't been following this thread, so excuse me if I suggest something that has already been tossed out. Solaris allows multiple IP addresses to be assigned to a single NIC. I just looked at

Re: [GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas

2004-11-16 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Hi, On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 14:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Chris and Karim, > > I haven't been following this thread, so excuse me if I suggest something > that has already been tossed out. > > Solaris allows multiple IP addresses to be assigned to a single NIC. I > just looked at the man p

Re: [GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas

2004-11-16 Thread Richard_D_Levine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 24x7x365

Re: [GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas

2004-11-15 Thread Chris Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karim Nassar) writes: > On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 21:16, Christopher Browne wrote: >> None of these systems _directly_ address how apps would get pointed to >> the shifting servers. > >> Something needs to be "smart enough" to point apps to the right place; >> that's something to th

Re: [GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas

2004-11-13 Thread Karim Nassar
On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 21:16, Christopher Browne wrote: > None of these systems _directly_ address how apps would get pointed to > the shifting servers. > Something needs to be "smart enough" to point apps to the right place; > that's something to think about... Seems like it would be pretty easy

Re: [GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas

2004-11-07 Thread Christopher Browne
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karim Nassar) wrote: > On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 18:10, Ed L. wrote: >> unfortunately, the requirement is 100% uptime all the time, and any >> downtime at all is a liability. Here are some of the issues: > > Seems like 100% uptime is alw

Re: [GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas

2004-11-07 Thread Karim Nassar
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 18:10, Ed L. wrote: > unfortunately, the requirement is 100% uptime all the time, and any > downtime at all is a liability. Here are some of the issues: Seems like 100% uptime is always an issue, but not even close to reality. I think it's unreasonable to expect a single pi

Re: [GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas

2004-11-03 Thread Dann Corbit
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed L. > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 5:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas > > > > I have a few high-volume,

[GENERAL] 24x7x365 high-volume ops ideas

2004-11-03 Thread Ed L.
I have a few high-volume, fairly large clusters that I'm struggling to keep up 24x7x365. I want to ask for advice from anyone with similar experience or hard-won wisdom. Generally these are clusters with 100-200 queries/second, maybe 10GB-30GB of data (always increasing), and maybe 10% writ