On 02/12/2007 13:02, Michelle Konzack wrote:
with 42 PostgreSQL servers of each 1,8 TByte.
Wow! Who ever said size wasn't everything :-)
Would you be willing to tell us a little about your hardware and
software set-up?
Also, are the servers running separate databases? - or is it one
w
Am 2007-11-29 12:50:58, schrieb Willy-Bas Loos:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to run one PostgreSQL cluster on more than one (hardware)
> server?
Yes of course... I run at a customer "Monster"
with 42 PostgreSQL servers of each 1,8 TByte.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Tamay
Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
I'll take that as a "no".
What i mean is to actually run exactly one cluster (no replicated copy) on
more than one server. Of course, if that were possible, why would people
bother with replication..
What you may be thinking of is having several machines running postgres
This is the system i am talking about:
http://people.planetpostgresql.org/xzilla/index.php?/archives/326-Solving-the-big-science-checklist.html
There are many parties involved, and i am trying to figure out what
configuration would be ideal for ours.
On Nov 29, 2007 3:20 PM, Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROT
On Nov 29, 2007 6:27 PM, Willy-Bas Loos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll take that as a "no".
> What i mean is to actually run exactly one cluster (no replicated copy) on
> more than one server. Of course, if that were possible, why would people
> bother with replication..
>
> I guess it is irrat
Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
I'll take that as a "no".
What i mean is to actually run exactly one cluster (no replicated copy) on
more than one server. Of course, if that were possible, why would people
bother with replication..
I guess it is irrational to suggest that it would be possible, since each
Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
Is there an implementation for this in PostgreSQL? It would have to be
something like pgPool (middleware), because: How would the query know on
which server to put it's data? And i guess i would need some Kerberos-like
implementation for my authentication and authorization.
I'll take that as a "no".
What i mean is to actually run exactly one cluster (no replicated copy) on
more than one server. Of course, if that were possible, why would people
bother with replication..
I guess it is irrational to suggest that it would be possible, since each
server would at least ne
Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to run one PostgreSQL cluster on more than one (hardware)
server?
WBL
You would be looking for replication.
Start with
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/high-availability.html
to get some idea on what is available for what you wish to achi
Hi,
Is it possible to run one PostgreSQL cluster on more than one (hardware)
server?
WBL
10 matches
Mail list logo
