Lewis Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If a person is interested in all the groups, is it hard to subscribe?
> No.
> If all groups are in one, is it hard to filter out? Yes.
Some people like to filter PG mail into different folders for different
lists, so that they can read with more foc
On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I don't agree in the least, I was actually going to suggest we add a
new one for relational design questions. I like many lists that are
contextually specific. IMO, general should be removed for example.
I think this makes sense for a web-b
Em Monday 04 February 2008 14:38:31 Csaba Nagy escreveu:
> Why don't you go ahead and create those special lists and make general
> collect all of them ? Some sort of hierarchy of lists... if doable at
> all, that could make everybody happy...
That's an excellent idea.
--
Jorge Godoy <[E
Lewis Cunningham wrote:
--- Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pgsql-hackers
pgsql-users
There really aren't any other groups of people. "people who want to
talk about
There are hackers (contribute to PostgreSQL), DBAs (administer the
database), Developers (write application to
--- Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> pgsql-hackers
> pgsql-users
>
> There really aren't any other groups of people. "people who want to
> talk about
There are hackers (contribute to PostgreSQL), DBAs (administer the
database), Developers (write application to interact with the
dat
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:48:16 +
>
> -performance is a little bit tougher because it may be a -hacker issue
> or an -admin issue.
In my experience it is really a carbon copy of -general. I wasn't even aware
of -admin before. Is it just "administra
Everyone,
> > I would junk pgsql-sql, pgsql-ports, pgsql-performance, pgsql-novice
> > and redirect them all to pgsql-general and pgsql-docs,
> > pgsql-interfaces, and pgsql-bugs and send them all to -hackers.
Speaking of keeping discussions on topic: this discussion is taking off in
a tangent a
On Mon, February 4, 2008 2:48 pm, Gregory Stark wrote:
> [*] "New newsgroups are formed not on The Field Of Dreams theory- "if you
> build it, they will come"- but on the Brooklyn Dodgers theory-
> "dammit,
> there's too many teams in this city: someone move out!"--Charles
> Seaton
It ap
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:48:16 +
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Right, I believe that is a valid argument. I think the real
> > problem is that as a community we are not diligent in pushing
> > people to the contextually specific lists we already have.
> I would junk pgsql-sql, pg
Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Lewis Cunningham wrote:
>> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I don't agree in the least, I was actually going to suggest we add a
>>> new one for relational design questions. I like many lists that are
>>> context
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:31:05 -0600
> Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The sole argument I'd have against that, and I think it's a good
>> one, is that just seeing the plethora of different topics moving
>> through pgsql-general has been a ke
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:31:05 -0600
Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The sole argument I'd have against that, and I think it's a good
> one, is that just seeing the plethora of different topics moving
> through pgsql-general has been a key factor to exposing me to new
> topics as well as havi
--- Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Lewis Cunningham wrote:
>
> >
> > I'd like to have many lists also. There are so many messages in
> > general that I have a hard time keeping up. I would like to be
> able
> > to just pick and choose those topics that int
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:52:42AM -0800, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
> Having a separate TLD actually increases the visibility of the effort
> from a search engine perspective.
Having just come from the domain name industry, I can report that that's
only sort of true. Did you "taste" this domain fo
On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Lewis Cunningham wrote:
--- "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:18:55 +
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I was going to suggest pruning the mailing lists down to just 3-4
--- "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:18:55 +
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > I was going to suggest pruning the mailing lists down to just 3-4
> > already. The last thing we need to b
On Feb 4, 2008 9:36 AM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Berkus escribió:
>
> > So, I'm in favor of a separate list, but think that having a separate
> > domain is a mistake. The separate domain says "this is a Drake and Selena
> > effort and not a community effort" to those not in
Josh Berkus escribió:
> So, I'm in favor of a separate list, but think that having a separate
> domain is a mistake. The separate domain says "this is a Drake and Selena
> effort and not a community effort" to those not involved.
Which is also what postgresqlconference.org and planetpostgresql
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:11:52 -0800
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I'm in favor of a separate list, but think that having a separate
> domain is a mistake. The separate domain says "this is a Drake and
> Selena effort and not a community effort" to those not involved.
Selena isn't i
> I agree except for that last bit. Search is huge and relying only on
> word-of-mouth is silly when we have plenty of people who know how to
> optimize.
This is completely the wrong argument to be having. Search engine issues
are important only *after* you have a certification exam and progra
On Feb 4, 2008 7:07 AM, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Selena Deckelmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Feb 4, 2008 4:27 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Even a new domain seems odd to me - if this is to be official, then
> >> surely it should be under postgresq
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 08:31 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:18:55 +
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was going to suggest pruning the mailing lists down to just 3-4
> > already. The last thing we need to b
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:18:55 +
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Guys, with respect this thread does nothing for us unless it is on
> > the certification list.
>
> Do we really need a separate mailing list for every thread? It's
>
On Monday 04 February 2008 09:52, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2008 4:27 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Even a new domain seems odd to me - if this is to be official, then
> > surely it should be under postgresql.org.
>
> Having a separate TLD actually increases the visibility
"Selena Deckelmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Feb 4, 2008 4:27 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Even a new domain seems odd to me - if this is to be official, then
>> surely it should be under postgresql.org.
>
> Having a separate TLD actually increases the visibility of the ef
On Feb 4, 2008 4:27 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even a new domain seems odd to me - if this is to be official, then
> surely it should be under postgresql.org.
Having a separate TLD actually increases the visibility of the effort
from a search engine perspective.
We can learn a le
Dave Page wrote:
> Even a new domain seems odd to me - if this is to be official, then
> surely it should be under postgresql.org.
+1
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
---(end of
On Feb 4, 2008 12:18 PM, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Guys, with respect this thread does nothing for us unless it is on the
> > certification list.
>
> Do we really need a separate mailing list for every thread? It's already kind
>
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 11:28:24 -0800
Ron Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Id really prefer my company be certified by the community rather
> >> than by a company, despite the full respect I have in SRA's
> >> engagement in PostgreSQL and that we all know their contributions
Josh Berkus wrote:
Id really prefer my company be certified by the community rather than by
a company, despite the full respect I have in SRA's engagement in
PostgreSQL and that we all know their contributions.
What would it mean for a company to be certified?
I'd hope it'd mean that I can have
JPA,
Id really prefer my company be certified by the community rather than by
a company, despite the full respect I have in SRA's engagement in
PostgreSQL and that we all know their contributions.
What would it mean for a company to be certified?
--Josh
---(end of br
Argentina presente ;-)
Regards,
gb.-
On Feb 3, 2008 6:49 AM, Jean-Paul Argudo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First of all, thanks to Josuah to start this usefull and long time
> waited project :-)
>
> Oleg Bartunov wrote :
> > Can you show us the goals of the PostgreSQL Certification ?
Hi all,
First of all, thanks to Josuah to start this usefull and long time
waited project :-)
Oleg Bartunov wrote :
> Can you show us the goals of the PostgreSQL Certification ?
To me, there are two things Id like to be "PostgreSQL Certified":
- individuals
- companies
Id really prefer my co
Well i'm also want to be PostgreSQL Certificated, Zarate always said that he
is the only one in Venezuela, but we are several people who want to have
certified on PostgreSQL
On Feb 1, 2008 4:19 PM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Santiago Zarate wrote:
> > Well until now... i think i
Santiago Zarate wrote:
> Well until now... i think i am the only venezuelan here i havent
> been able to locate Cesar Villanueva >.< anyone knows other
> venezuelans arround?
I think they are talking about Ricardo Strusberg. He was interested in
setting up a Pg training/certification pro
Well until now... i think i am the only venezuelan here i havent
been able to locate Cesar Villanueva >.< anyone knows other
venezuelans arround?
Btw... i've joined the cert list aswell
2008/1/31, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Josh,
However running a certification programs (not just making examins) is
not a trivial work. Moreover it costs a lot of money (over $40,000 per
year in our case). Josh, how do you overcome those problems?
As the resources become required I am sure that I can make sure t
> Josh,
>
> > Myself and a small team of PostgreSQL contributors have started a new
> > community project for PostgreSQL Certification. It is just launching
> > but we wanted to get it out there so that people can join in on the
> > discussion now :).
>
> Who else is in this? Have you talked to
I suggest to explicitly invite the Russian folks too.
Oleg showed strong interest in a global certification thing.
we can contribute some material and so on if needed. it is currently
in german but it should not be a big problem.
many thanks,
hans
On Jan 30, 2008,
Josh Berkus wrote:
Josh,
Myself and a small team of PostgreSQL contributors have started a new
community project for PostgreSQL Certification. It is just launching
but we wanted to get it out there so that people can join in on the
discussion now :).
Who else is in this? Have you talked to t
Josh Berkus wrote:
Josh,
Myself and a small team of PostgreSQL contributors have started a new
community project for PostgreSQL Certification. It is just launching
but we wanted to get it out there so that people can join in on the
discussion now :).
Who else is in this? Have you talked to t
Can you show us the goals of the PostgreSQL Certification ?
I always voted for the united PostgreSQL Certification program
(amin, developer) we could promote with the help of commercial companies.
In my opinion, common certificate, valid in all countries will be much more
useful than buttons. We
Josh,
I have not spoken with SRA or the Venezualan folks but am more than
happy to have them involved.
OK, I'll get you some contact info.
--Josh
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:17:43 -0800
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Current broadcast members are:
Myself
Magnus
Robert
Chander (need to get him on the website)
Bruce has a pending invitation (which I didn't send yet)
I have not spoken with S
Josh,
Myself and a small team of PostgreSQL contributors have started a new
community project for PostgreSQL Certification. It is just launching
but we wanted to get it out there so that people can join in on the
discussion now :).
Who else is in this? Have you talked to the Venezualan folks?
45 matches
Mail list logo
