Re: [GENERAL] [XP SP2/SP3] FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory

2008-06-25 Thread Magnus Hagander
Łukasz Czerpak wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> 487 is "Invalid address". >> >> Do you have any antivirus or similar software on the machine? If so, try >> uninstalling it and trying again (just disabling it is usually not >> enough). >> > > Yes - NOD32. Ok i will check it. NOD32 is known to

Re: [GENERAL] [XP SP2/SP3] FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory

2008-06-25 Thread Łukasz Czerpak
Magnus Hagander wrote: 487 is "Invalid address". Do you have any antivirus or similar software on the machine? If so, try uninstalling it and trying again (just disabling it is usually not enough). Yes - NOD32. Ok i will check it. Is it possible that PostgreSQL works improperly on WinXP + NO

Re: [GENERAL] [XP SP2/SP3] FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory

2008-06-25 Thread Magnus Hagander
Łukasz Czerpak wrote: > Hi, > > We have problems with PostgreSQL on Windows. > > PostgreSQL: 8.3.1 > System: Windows XP (SP3) > FS: NTFS > Hardware: IBM x3650, 1x Xeon Quad, 2GB RAM > > > The database is accessed from multiple windows apps. One of them has a > connection pool, the others use si

[GENERAL] [XP SP2/SP3] FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory

2008-06-25 Thread Łukasz Czerpak
Hi, We have problems with PostgreSQL on Windows. PostgreSQL: 8.3.1 System: Windows XP (SP3) FS: NTFS Hardware: IBM x3650, 1x Xeon Quad, 2GB RAM The database is accessed from multiple windows apps. One of them has a connection pool, the others use single connection per app. Somethimes when I st