* Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-10 09:49:01 CEST]:
> Alexander Wirt [2008-10-10 7:02 +0200]:
> > mechanized? No.
>
> I meant it in the sense of "run a script to create a backport from a
> particular testing/unstable release, as opposed to changing any source
> package and upload it ma
* Markus Wanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-10 10:27:51 CEST]:
> Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > This is what formorer doesn't like, and honestly, as much as I would
> > like to help getting things working again and support postgres users
> > here, I have to agree with him.
>
> What solution do you ha
Hi!
* Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-02 18:12:47 CEST]:
> Markus Wanner [2008-10-02 12:49 +0200]:
> > Unfortunately we are stuck with several Postgres 8.2 installations from
> > etch backports, which are no longer maintained by the backports, because
> > only 8.2 got dropped from
Hi again :)
* Markus Wanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-06 17:34:13 CEST]:
> Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > On the
> > other hand, I still don't fully understand the problems of not being
> > able to upgrade to pg-8.3 properly. People seem to have been able to
> > upgrade from 8.1 to 8.2, so w
Hi!
One (hopefully) last reply. :)
* Markus Wanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-07 10:52:55 CEST]:
> Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Then again, that was already required when switching from 8.1 to 8.2.
> > And it was never a secret that backports.org is a moving target, just as
> > testing i
