Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] PlPython

2003-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane kirjutas E, 30.06.2003 kell 01:21: >> Who's still using 1.5, I guess is the question? And are they likely >> to be updating their PG installation when they're not updating Python? > I guess that anyone who needs safe Restricted Execution will b

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] PlPython

2003-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The version with patch which removes RExec (as Python 2.x is not > supporting it ) is the right thoing to do FOR PYTHON 2.X, but there is > no reason to remove safe execution when using python 1.5.x. Who's still using 1.5, I guess is the question? And a

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] PlPython

2003-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > could we not just make sure that plpython uses python ver < 2.x and use > plpythonu for python versions >= 2.x until a secure regex solution comes > from Guido and folks ? We'd still have to mark it untrusted, so what's the point?