On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:59:07AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
>
>
> (On that note I would dearly love to get rid of the stupid "[GENERAL]"
> "[HACKERS]" etc tags? Filtering on subject is a dumb way to filter your mail,
> there are perfectly good headers inserted by the list manager that don't get
>
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:59:07AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> (On that note I would dearly love to get rid of the stupid "[GENERAL]"
> "[HACKERS]" etc tags? Filtering on subject is a dumb way to filter your mail,
I am with you on this. I find the tag useless and annoying.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<[
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is also possible for mailing list software to handle this preference for
> you (by not sending copies to addresses on the list that appear in the
> recipient headers), but I don't know if the software in use has that
> capability.
I've noticed som
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is also possible for mailing list software to handle this
> preference for you (by not sending copies to addresses on the list
> that appear in the recipient headers), but I don't know if the
> software in use has that capability.
That's a good poin
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:33:18 +,
Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:02:41AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:49:46 +,
> > Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a perpetual problem, if people all used t
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:02:41AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:49:46 +,
> Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This is a perpetual problem, if people all used the same MUA and
> > (assuming it has the capability) all used the 'reply to list' command
>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:49:46 +,
Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is a perpetual problem, if people all used the same MUA and
> (assuming it has the capability) all used the 'reply to list' command
> to reply to the list everything would be wonderful! :-)
I think using ma
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > Are you saying this is going to make it impossible for me to reply just
> > to the poster, or is this an option that is set by the user via majordomo?
>
> No, the poster will still be included as part of the headers ...
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Are you saying this is going to make it impossible for me to reply just
to the poster, or is this an option that is set by the user via majordomo?
No, the poster will still be included as part of the headers ... what
happens, at least under Pine, is that I
Are you saying this is going to make it impossible for me to reply just
to the poster, or is this an option that is set by the user via majordomo?
---
Jim Seymour wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> What is the general opinion of this? I'd like to implement it, but not so
> much so that I'm going to beat my head against a brick wall on it ...
The procmail rules I set up for each mailing list to which I subscribe
sets Reply-To to the mail
11 matches
Mail list logo
