Tom Lane-2 wrote:
>
> Sorry, I meant to ask whether the *failure* was repeatable.
>
Oh, I see. Well, to the extent that i had the same problem in two different
remote clients before finding that the local connection work-around made it
go away, I would say that it was repeatable. In short,
Neil Best writes:
> Tom Lane-2 wrote:
>> You're talking like you've found this to be repeatable. Is it?
> It is indeed repeatable, Tom. I was able to perform my \copy batch job
> multiple times without error by working over the local connection. I had to
> run it many times to iteratively catc
Tom Lane-2 wrote:
>
> Neil Best writes:
>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> BTW, the "SSL renegotiation failure" bit
>>> suggests that it could have been an OpenSSL bug not a real network
>>> lossage, so you might want to see how up-to-date your openssl libraries
>>> are.
>
Tom Lane-2 wrote:
>
> Neil Best writes:
>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> BTW, the "SSL renegotiation failure" bit
>>> suggests that it could have been an OpenSSL bug not a real network
>>> lossage, so you might want to see how up-to-date your openssl libraries
>>> are.
>
