Re: [GENERAL] [Fwd: MySQL Benchmark page - Problem with vacuum() in PostgreSQL]

2001-08-14 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! > "Tom" == Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forwards: >> The problem was that when we run the benchmark with the --fast option, >> which basicly does a vacuum() between after each batch of updates, >> postmaster started to fill up disk with log

Re: [GENERAL] [Fwd: MySQL Benchmark page - Problem with vacuum() in PostgreSQL]

2001-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forwards: > The problem was that when we run the benchmark with the --fast option, > which basicly does a vacuum() between after each batch of updates, > postmaster started to fill up disk with log files during one of the > vacuum() runs and didn't stop until the d

[GENERAL] [Fwd: MySQL Benchmark page - Problem with vacuum() in PostgreSQL]

2001-07-29 Thread Justin Clift
Hi all, The "MySQL Benchmark" page on the mysql.com website has benchmarks for various databases : http://www.mysql.com/information/benchmarks.html In the PostgreSQL entry they aren't able to report an "accurate" result for all things, as they haven't been able to get vacuum to work 100% correc