Bruce Momjian wrote on Mon, 16 Aug 1999 14:24:57 EDT
>> [. . .]
>> Currently, pgsql 6.5.x breaks up the files containing
>> tables into roughly 1 GB chunks. My question is: will
>> pgsql do the same for the files containing the indices?
>>
>> Correction to info in my previous post: my index fil
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Martin Weinberg wrote:
> Currently, pgsql 6.5.x breaks up the files containing
> tables into roughly 1 GB chunks. My question is: will
> pgsql do the same for the files containing the indices?
It should do, as it's the StorageManager that does the splitting, and
tables/ind
> Dear CN,
>
> Yes, thanks for you message. I am well aware of the
> 32 bit=2GB limitation in the ext2fs.
>
> Currently, pgsql 6.5.x breaks up the files containing
> tables into roughly 1 GB chunks. My question is: will
> pgsql do the same for the files containing the indices?
>
> Correction
Dear CN,
Yes, thanks for you message. I am well aware of the
32 bit=2GB limitation in the ext2fs.
Currently, pgsql 6.5.x breaks up the files containing
tables into roughly 1 GB chunks. My question is: will
pgsql do the same for the files containing the indices?
Correction to info in my previ
> I have a 40 million record database (about 40GB and growing) and I
> notice that some of my multicolumn indices are beginning to approach
> 2GB on disk.
>
> Will there be any problems spanning the 32 bit limit here (a la tables
> in version 6.4)?
Please refer to the attached messages from [EMA
