Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-08-04 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi Robert-san Ahh yes.. I'm sorry delaying release bugfix was not included in pg8.3.3. Then,I will adjust next release(1.6.3/4) with Rarf-san again. Regards, Hiroshi Saito. >Hiroshi-san, > >Is this something specific to windows? If so, should this be consider a bug? > >Robert Treat > >On Sunda

Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-08-04 Thread Robert Treat
Hiroshi-san, Is this something specific to windows? If so, should this be consider a bug? Robert Treat On Sunday 03 August 2008 18:01:05 Hiroshi Saito wrote: > Hi. > > Sorry, it was not included in release. > please see, > http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/ > > Regards, > Hiroshi Saito

Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-08-03 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi. Sorry, it was not included in release. please see, http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/ Regards, Hiroshi Saito >Hi all, > >I installed postgresql-8.3.3-1 for win2000 with UUID-OSSP. Following >the documentation I issued this query: > >SELECT uuid_generate_v3(uuid_ns_url(), 'http://w

UUID in windows was Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-08-03 Thread Scott Marlowe
Pretty sure the uuid stuff only works in non-windows OSes. Oh, and next time, use a more descriptive subject line for better / quicker responses. On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:18 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I installed postgresql-8.3.3-1 for win2000 with UUID-OSSP. Following the > do

[GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-08-03 Thread grafl
Hi all, I installed postgresql-8.3.3-1 for win2000 with UUID-OSSP. Following the documentation I issued this query: SELECT uuid_generate_v3(uuid_ns_url(), 'http://www.postgresql.org'); but the DB returns with this error message: ERROR: function uuid_ns_url() does not exist SQL state: 42883

Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: port fault on pg_ctl's

2007-02-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Documentation patch attached and applied to HEAD and 8.2.X. --- Palle Girgensohn wrote: > > > --On onsdag, december 13, 2006 11.04.54 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Gergely CZUCZY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: port fault on pg_ctl's

2006-12-13 Thread Palle Girgensohn
--On onsdag, december 13, 2006 11.04.54 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Gergely CZUCZY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: This is wierd, I agree. The split between server and client is really made = in the postgresql sources, I just follow their guidelines. [ checks RPM specfiles ... ]

Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: port fault on pg_ctl's place]

2006-12-13 Thread Tom Lane
Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From INSTALL: > ... >Client-only installation: If you want to install only the client >applications and interface libraries, then you can use these >commands: > gmake -C src/bin install > gmake -C src/include install > gmake -C

Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: port fault on pg_ctl's place]

2006-12-13 Thread Tom Lane
Gergely CZUCZY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is wierd, I agree. The split between server and client is really made = > in the postgresql sources, > I just follow their guidelines. [ checks RPM specfiles ... ] Both Devrim and I put pg_ctl in the server subpackage, dunno where you think that t

[GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: port fault on pg_ctl's place]

2006-12-13 Thread Gergely CZUCZY
hello, please read this post and the comment for it, maybe the postgresql may need an update at separating the binaries. this was pointed out in the FreeBSD ports collection. - Forwarded message from Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:52:00 +0100 From: Pall

Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED],65$($k!"NY$N1|MMEp;#Ej9F$N?$BJT

2005-12-15 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Tom, Am 2005-12-15 11:19:03, schrieb Tom Lane: > Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Since some days we become SPAMed. > > > How can this happen, if the list is subscriber only? > > Marc accidentally turned off the subscribers-only filter for a few days :-( > It's been fixed,

Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED],65$($k!"NY$N1|MMEp;#Ej9F$N?$BJT

2005-12-15 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello *, Since some days we become SPAMed. How can this happen, if the list is subscriber only? I have this question, because <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> are two servers where I do not filter SPAM (wast of resources because they are subscriber only) Greetings Michelle Am 2005-1

Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED] and http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/

2005-10-12 Thread Robert Treat
On Thursday 29 September 2005 01:28, pkondratev wrote: > Hi, > two questions > 1. Why on page http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/ no reference > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oversight, fixed now in CVS, will appear on next site build. As a reminder for everyone, questions about website content /

[GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED] and http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/

2005-09-28 Thread pkondratev
Hi, two questions 1. Why on page http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/ no reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. Somebody tried work Kernel Mode Linux and PostgreSQL, there were problems? ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Us