Fujii Masao ha scritto:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Michele Petrazzo - Unipex
wrote:
- why in my tests, _whitout_ common direcotory, master and slave
keep in sync also if I shutdown slave, add (in my last tests)
something about 100k record (although little ones) on the master
and then afte
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Michele Petrazzo - Unipex
wrote:
> - why in my tests, _whitout_ common direcotory, master and slave keep in
> sync also if I shutdown slave, add (in my last tests) something about
> 100k record (although little ones) on the master and then after woke up
> the slave
>
> P.s. Glad to see that also in Italy there are PostgreSQL guru ;)
>
Glad to see that more people are using Indian words (Guru) :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guru
Regards,
Jayadevan
DISCLAIMER:
"The information in this e-mail and any attachment is intended only for
the person to whom
Gabriele Bartolini ha scritto:
Ciao Michele,
Ciao ;)
both server (master and standby) need a common directory where
read
and write the wal files?
Not necessarily. You can use for instance scp to ship the WAL file
from the master to the standby using the network.
Thanks for the explain
Ciao Michele,
> both server (master and standby) need a common directory where read
and write the wal files?
Not necessarily. You can use for instance scp to ship the WAL file from
the master to the standby using the network.
> Just another question about replication: there is the possibil
Hi list,
I'm trying the new features into a test environment for see how all
works and I'm finding first problems with setup.
After reading the various Streaming_Replication, Warm_Standby and
What's_new_in_PostgreSQL_9.0 on the wiki, one first question born: both
server (master and standby) need
