2013/10/1 Perry Smith
>
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Adrian Klaver
> wrote:
>
> > Assuming you are not doing this in a function, you can. Do UPDATE, then
> SELECT to see your changes or not and then ROLLBACK.
>
> Ah... yes. I forgot you can see the changes within the same transaction.
> Dohh
On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 10/01/2013 10:16 AM, Perry Smith wrote:
>> With "make" I can do "make -n" and it just tells me what it would do but
>> doesn't actually do anything.
>>
>> How could I do that with SQL?
>>
>> I want to write a really complicated (for me) S
On 10/01/2013 10:16 AM, Perry Smith wrote:
With "make" I can do "make -n" and it just tells me what it would do but
doesn't actually do anything.
How could I do that with SQL?
I want to write a really complicated (for me) SQL UPDATE statement. I'm sure I
won't get it right the first time. I
With "make" I can do "make -n" and it just tells me what it would do but
doesn't actually do anything.
How could I do that with SQL?
I want to write a really complicated (for me) SQL UPDATE statement. I'm sure I
won't get it right the first time. Is there an easy way to not really make the
c
