Woodchuck Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> That's his perogative. His server, his rules (or whoever's he set the
>> groups up on). We don't have the right to dictate what groups he puts
>> on his news server. If someone else decides to take
Woodchuck Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>> The UDP would be aimed at the news server(s) at which the mailing list
>>> is being improperly gated. It is their responsibility to reject
>>> improper traffic. As these same server
Mike Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I also offered to let him take over the process as he understands gatewaying
>and the details better than I. I also offered to let him create the next
>RFD, and hopefully he will agree to do it if he has the time. He is the
>most connected member of the postg
