exists) but it
surely works.
Regards,
Ntinos Katsaros
PS: libpq has nothing to do with the above :-)!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you very much for your reply. The thing is that my SRF is written in
C, not plpgsql, but I'll look into RAISE NOTICE anyway.(I think there is
something
Thank you very much for your reply. The thing is that my SRF is written in
C, not plpgsql, but I'll look into RAISE NOTICE anyway.(I think there is
something equevalent in libpq)
Thanks again,
Ntinos Katsaros
Kris Jurka writes:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ever
other type of)info together with
the result tuples (even if it requiers some hacking i.e. there is no
provision for something like that)? Any ideas?
Regards,
Ntinos Katsaros
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives
re relname=
Ntinos Katsaros
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
7;m a little
confused on its structure. Any pointers?
Thanks,
Ntinos Katsaros
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
it worked. However, the problem now is that it is slow
(surely slower than using blocking commands).
If the code above is right (?), why is that?
Thanks for your response,
Ntinos Katsaros
Tom Lane writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
if (PQconsumeInput(conn)!=1) elog(ERROR,"Err
e is used inside a SRF that is intended to return tuples from remote
dbs (as in dblink). For the time being I query local tables.
I use v7.4.2.
Is this something too obvious to see it :-) ? Is it something with
nonblocking connection establishment? Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Ntinos Ka
e
tables and SPI to retrieve the Oids ($%&^#$%&!!). When I tried to also
retrieve the Oid using libp it worked. I suppose using SPI both to create
the tables and retrieve the Oids will be the right solution. I'll try it!
Hope this helps,
It did help to understand what was g
k (like in testlibpq.c example in the documentation) but
with no result. Maybe the whole process described above runs in a sigle
transaction block i.e. that of my SRF(?). I'm a little confused here.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Ntinos Katsaros
---(e