Re: [GENERAL] The reasoning behind having several features outside

2004-10-30 Thread nd02tsk
Jeff Davis wrote: > Other people have answered, but I'd like to add: > > It makes it much faster to fix bugs and improve features in the projects > outside of the source tree. If replication has a bug, you don't want to > wait for the next point release, you want a fix *now*. PostgreSQL is a > big

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-27 Thread nd02tsk
>Two: If a > single process in a multi-process application crashes, that process > alone dies. The buffer is flushed, and all the other child processes > continue happily along. In a multi-threaded environment, when one > thread dies, they all die. So this means that if a single connection thr

[GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based arch?

2004-10-27 Thread nd02tsk
Hello! I have a couple of final ( I hope, for your sake ) questions regarding PostgreSQL. I understand PostgreSQL uses processes rather than threads. I found this statement in the archives: "The developers agree that multiple processes provide more benefits (mostly in stability and robustness) t

[GENERAL] The reasoning behind having several features outside of source?

2004-10-25 Thread nd02tsk
Hello Why is it that PostgreSQL chooses to have features like replication, fulltext indexing and GIS maintained by others outside of the sourcetree? I appreciate any answers. Thank you. Tim ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched o

[GENERAL] PgSQL MVCC vs MySQL InnoDB

2004-10-25 Thread nd02tsk
Hello Harrison Fisk from MySQL claims in this thread: http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?35,3981,4245#msg-4245 That there are no major differences between InnoDB and MVCC concurrency. Is this true? Thank you. Tim ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3:

Re: [GENERAL] Information about storge engine in PostgreSQL

2004-10-22 Thread nd02tsk
I really appreciate these type of high-quality anwsers, thank you. Tim > On 10/21/2004 10:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hello >> >> MySQL has information about several storage engines. MEMORY to handle >> temporary tables, InnoDB to handle transactions and which also can split >> its table

[GENERAL] Information about storge engine in PostgreSQL

2004-10-21 Thread nd02tsk
Hello MySQL has information about several storage engines. MEMORY to handle temporary tables, InnoDB to handle transactions and which also can split its table data over several files/partitions. Splitting of storage is something which according to the following article, PostgreSQL does not support

[GENERAL] How to time several queries?

2004-10-18 Thread nd02tsk
Hello I know it is possible to time isolated queries through the settting of the \timing option in psql. This makes PgSQL report the time it took to perform one operation. I would like to know how one can get a time summary of many operations, if it is at all possible. Thank you. Tim

[GENERAL] Does PostgreSQL provide anything comparable with MySQL Cluster?

2004-10-14 Thread nd02tsk
Hello Does PostgreSQL provide anything comparable with the functionality of MySQL Cluster? I appreciate all information. Thank you. Tim ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe

[GENERAL] Level of replication support?

2004-10-13 Thread nd02tsk
Hello I am going to do a comparison betweem PgSQL and MySQL replication system. I hear there are some replication projects available for PgSQL. Which are still active and serious, because I hear that some are not active or incomplete? Will any of these projects be merged with PgSQL soon? I app