Hi Michael ,
Thank you for your information!!
I understand.
I'll consider to upgrade to 9.4.5.
I'm grateful for all your support.
Yoji
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Streaming-replication-stacked-tp5880104p5880550.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL
Hi Andreas and Michael,
Thank you for your information!
Let me know, which should I choose update to 9.4.5 or hot_standby_feedback
off?
Best regards.
Yoji
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Streaming-replication-stacked-tp5880104p5880487.html
Sent from the
Hi Michael,
Thank you for replying.
I'm using version of 9.4.3.
And I have seen same behavior on version of 9.3.4.
Best regards.
Yoji
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Streaming-replication-stacked-tp5880104p5880329.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - ge
Hi, Andreas
Thank you for replying.
You're right, I have only 1 slave.
And I need running transactions on slave.
Once I restarted postgres service on slave and then process began to move.
Best regards.
Yoji
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Stre
Hi Chiru ,
Thank you for your information.
I send wals to standby server using "wal sender" processes.
And I had checked logs but It was nothing.
Best regards.
Yoji
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Streaming-replication-stacked-tp5880104p58
Hi, Andreas
Thank you for reply.
Below is the recovery.conf.
--
standby_mode = on
primary_conninfo = 'host=172.16.xxx.xxx user=xx'
trigger_file = '/tmp/trigger_file0'
------
Best regar