On 02/02/15 10:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> If you did "select * from only primate" you would see that there is no
> such row in the parent table, which is what the foreign key is being
> enforced against.
Thanks. That does a lot to clarify it.
-Will
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsq
On 02/02/15 12:11 AM, David G Johnston wrote:
> William Gordon Rutherdale wrote
>> My problem: could someone please explain the semantics and why this
>> behaviour makes sense -- or is it a design error or bug?
> I didn't read your post in depth but I suspect you have no
Hi.
I have encountered a problem with references when using INHERITS (on
Postgres 9.1/9.2). Could someone please explain why this occurs.
Consider this example.
CREATE TABLE primate
(
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
name TEXT,
tale TEXT
);
CREATE TABLE chimp
(
human_friend TEXT
) INHERITS
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Klaver [mailto:adrian.kla...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 21 December 2010 20:36
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Cc: William Gordon Rutherdale (rutherw)
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Cannot unsubscribe
>
> On Tuesday 21 December 2010 4
unsub pgsql-general
The unsubscribe command did not succeed.
No e-mail addresses matching
**** "William Gordon Rutherdale (rutherw)"
are subscribed to the pgsql-general mailing list.
Valid commands processed: 1
0 succeeded, 0 stalled, and 1 failed.
Use
