Correct, the default setting for PostgreSQL 8.1 W32 value in postgresql.conf
is 'autovacuum' to 'on'.
You can see this and more settings in pgAdmin III by visiting 'Tools',
'Server Configuration', then the config file of your choice.
Now, if only I could setup my home to autovaccum.
-Origin
Go ahead and proceed through the click-throughs...this is still the same old
demo for development and testing only that they have had available for some
time.
This updated on Oct-28th only is for a newer
version(http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/xe/index
.html) of the sam
Again, the previously provide link is NOT the version that is licensed free
for commercial production use!
The version in the headlines lately suggesting a free Oracle database for
professional and production use is NOT YET PUBLICLY AVAILABLE [expected by
year-end]. Still, the link below is likel
Still, at least Oracle 10g provides for an easy GUI from which to configure
and perform imports and exports of data. Some of use have need for a
database that can dump all data and accept another series of new data...only
to be dropped again in a few days. The GUI tools make this MUCH easier -
es
Precisely the point I was trying to make sure everyone would understand
clearly. Although I don't have a copy of Oracle's suspected new license, if
it is close to the existing license verbiage, even though it is "crippled"
by having certain hardware and software limits, those limits are per
physic
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 11:50 AM
To: Wes Williams
Cc: Postgresql-General; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?
I assume they are probably thinking of a free for non-commercial use,
which is great and all, but I assume that lik
I presume this thread was all brought about by the /. article
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/31/0659254&tid=221&tid=1
87
According to the link provided in the /. article
(http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-5920796.html), Oracle has *proposed* a
free version by "year end". Obv
Even with a primary UPS on the *entire PostgreSQL server* does one still
need, or even still recommend, a battery-backed cache on the RAID controller
card? [ref SCSI 320, of course]
If so, I'd be interest in knowing briefly why.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
===snip===
...
every server I'
Type the following at the Windows command prompt (start, run, "cmd"):
convert c: /fs:ntfs /v
It will complain about locked files and perform the convert at the next
reboot, which you should do immediately.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jos
set sql_mode='MYSQL323';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Marlowe
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:24 PM
To: Wes Williams
Cc: 'Jan'; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GE
For what it may be worth, executing the same commands into MySQL
5.0.15-nt-max (Win XP Pro) the following it received:
mysql> create table test (i1 int);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.41 sec)
mysql> insert into test values (123913284723498723423);
ERROR 1264 (22003): Out of range value adjusted fo
What
platform? Solaris, FreeBSD, Linux, Windows
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Michael
UvhagenSent: Friday, October 21, 2005 6:10 AMTo:
pgsql-general@postgresql.orgSubject: [GENERAL]
passwordHi.I was installing po
12 matches
Mail list logo
