,
Warren Bell
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
ses the same exact database on the Apple I get a
"Bad
> Timestamp Format at 23 in 2008-09-16 18:41:00.479" error. I am guessing
> that it has something to do with how Java creates Dates on Unix verses
> Windows. Is this a JDBC issue or is there something I need to do in
> Postg
t;Bad
Timestamp Format at 23 in 2008-09-16 18:41:00.479" error. I am guessing
that it has something to do with how Java creates Dates on Unix verses
Windows. Is this a JDBC issue or is there something I need to do in
Postgres to make this work?
--
Thanks,
Warren Bell
909-645-8864
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
l-8.3-603.jdbc3.jar as
the driver.
I see that you can escape by doing E'Joe\'s', but how do I get this to
work without going through my code and shouldn't this be done by the
driver.
How do I get this all to work?
--
Thanks,
Warren Bell
909-645-8864
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
I guess it would help if I cast to the correct type. I was doing cast(
cast( 1000 as integer ) as char ) instead of character varying, char(n)
or text.
Thanks,
Warren
Warren Bell wrote:
I am trying to cast an int to a character. The int is the number 1000
it gets cast down to "1&quo
I am trying to cast an int to a character. The int is the number 1000 it
gets cast down to "1" and not "1000". How do I cast from int to
character without loosing the trailing zeros?
--
Thanks,
Warren Bell
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.
Is there a pdf version of the documentation ? I find HTML version much
harder to read than a printed copy.
Thanks,
Warren Bell
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Marlowe
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 8:24 AM
> To: Warren Bell
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Speed problems
>
>
> On Tue, 20
>On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:20, Warren Bell wrote:
>> I am having problems with performance. I think this is a simple question
and
>> I am in the right place, if not, please redirect me.
>>
>> I have a table with 36 fields that slows down quite a bit after some
light
>&
will not speed it up. I drop the table and
recreate it and insert one record and it speeds right back up takeing only
100 ms to do the query.
I am fairly new to Postgres. What do I need to do to keep this table from
slowing down?
Thanks,
Warren Bell
---(end of
10 matches
Mail list logo