++pgjdbc dev list.
>I am facing unusual connection breakdown problem. Here is the simple code
that I am using to read WAL file:
Does it always fails?
Can you create a test case? For instance, if you file a pull request with
the test, it will get automatically tested across various PG versions, so
> but in this case all these transactions are independent with autocommit off,
At database level, there is no "autocommit=off".
There's just "begin-end".
It is database who forbids .commit, not the JDBC driver.
Vladimir
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To m
>Is it a bug or do we have other any alternate way to handle this ?
PostgreSQL is strongly against "partial commits to the database". If
you think a bit about it, it is not that bad.
You got an error, what is the business case to commit the partial
transaction then?
Exceptions should not be used
>Ok. I understand, to put there a pull request, I must to register into this
>webpage ??
Exactly.
Vladimir
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>As I understand, it's all what you need, isn't you
Ideally I would like to see a pull request at
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pulls, however your code seems to be
good enough so somebody else can pick it up, simplify a bit, and file
a PR.
Vladimir
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing lis
> I hope I have been the most clear as my poor level of English could be..
It would be great if you could express that in java + sql as well, so
the exact code can be added to JDBC driver test suite as a regression
test.
Vladimir
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.
) with index
on pid.
Any pitfalls with that kind of "update mostly table"?
[1]: http://research.google.com/pubs/pub36356.html
--
Regards,
Vladimir Sitnikov
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.post
