caching in ZFS. As I
understand it now such config can provide better results since data will be
cached once in ZFS.
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> On 09/24/2017 11:03 AM, Vladimir Mihailenco wrote:
> > Thanks for your response. Ss I understand it now the difference is
e a typo? If not then what data is written synchronously?
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/23/2017 08:18 AM, Vladimir Mihailenco wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder what is the point of setting max WAL size bigger than shared
> >
Hi,
I wonder what is the point of setting max WAL size bigger than shared
buffers, e.g.
shared_buffers = 512mb
max_wal_size = 2gb
As I understand a checkpoint happens after 2gb of data were modified
(writter to WAL), but shared buffers can contain at most 512mb of dirty
pages to be flushed to th
Hi,
I wonder what is the point of setting max WAL size bigger than shared
buffers, e.g.
shared_buffers = 512mb
max_wal_size = 2gb
As I understand a checkpoint happens after 2gb of data were modified
(writter to WAL), but shared buffers can contain at most 512mb of dirty
pages to be flushed to th