I am combining query results that I know are disjoint. I'm wondering
how much overhead there is in calling union versus union all. (Just
curious really; I can't see a reason not to use union all.) (cc me
please; not subscribed...)
THK
--
Timothy H. Keitt
http://www.keittlab.org/
--
Sent via pg
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > encode spatial proximity. Is there an API (backend C-level is fine) to
> > access a GIST index?
> >
>
> The best way is to extend existing interface to GiST to support KNN-search.
> But you can see how to get access t
I was wondering if there is a way to get access to the tree structure
underlying at GIST index? What I would like to do is perform a
breadth-first search on the tree in order to find nearest neighbors
(using PostGIS data types). Nearest neighbor searchers are not very
efficient using only range que