Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Christian Marschalek writes:
> > well i ment over apache (with php) to a database :o)
> Apache encrypts the connection to the web user, PostgreSQL encrypts the
> connection to the database user, which in this case would be Apache.
> I.e.:
> Web user ---SSL---> Apache ---S
"Anthony E . Greene" wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:02:43 Gregory Wood wrote:
> >> Does anyone else get annoyed when going on to an american site to
> >> register or buy something and find that the state field is only
> >> 2 characters long?
> [snip]
> >Does anyone else get annoyed when people ju
John Burski wrote:
> > I really don't understand why people expect computers to do everything
> > for them, the burden of using tools properly belongs to the user.
> Let the congregation say "Amen!"
The counterpoints:
(Complex tool)
A car comes assembled, from the factory, tuned to accelerate, a
Jarmo Paavilainen wrote:
> > Just curious, what kind of tables did you set up in MySQL? My
> Ehh... there are more than one kind... I did not know. Still with
> transactions on PostgreSQL (unsafe method?) MySQL was 2 times as fast as
> PostgreSQL. I will check this out, and return to this list wi
shawn everett wrote:
> > What do you consider "passing a parameter to the view" to be?
> This is where Microsoft Access has twisted me :)
> Access as you may or may not know allows you to use parameters in a query:
> SELECT * FROM table WHERE table.pkey=[Enter The Primary Key];
> The bit in [] rep
Andrew Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:43:32AM -0700, Ron Chmara wrote:
> > I'm a bit late on this thread, but I'm currently wranging a large
> > set of migrations:
> > postgreSQL-> Oracle
> Would you mind explaining why your company's migrati
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 04:27:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-2000-05/lw-05-database.html
> > >
> > > It mentions PostgreSQL. I was interviewed for the article.
> >
> > Nice article, but the author should get some facs
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2000, Ron Chmara wrote:
> > Well, you have binaries for NT, but what about home users/developers on 95?
> 98? > mySQL even does OS/2. Really.
> For home use/development, run either Linux or FreeBSD in another partition on
> your Win9x machi
"Brett W. McCoy" wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2000, Ron Chmara wrote:
> > limited
> > in platform support compared to mysql.
And:
> > Well, you have binaries for NT, but what about home users/developers on 95? 98?
> > mySQL even does OS/2. Really.
> But
"Brett W. McCoy" wrote:
> MySQL is great for small websites with small budgets with read-only data
> or data that doesn't change often. It doesn't scale very well at all, and
> for larger sites it really falls apart without anyy referential integrity
> or supprto for views. But beyond that, you
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> Pgsql has scads of additional features, but is limited
> in platform support compared to mysql.
>
> Huh? You caught my eye on this one ... what platform are we missing? :(
Well, you have binaries for NT, but what about home users/developers on 95? 98?
mySQL even doe
surfer girl wrote:
>
> The documentation on this is so scarse it's hard to figure out what the right format
>is supposed to be for all this. After much searching (websites, various mailing list
>archives), I found the "note" that PHP has a special variable "userfile" for file
>uploads.
It has
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Ron Chmara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000116 16:18] wrote:
Snip_> Of security items.
> All these options don't take into account that perhaps you don't
> want people _on the same box_
Well, I assumed that web clients, using cgi, was the &quo
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> On 2000-01-14, Alfred Perlstein mentioned:
>
> > > issue: how to secure cgi's that access postgres
> > >
> > > problem: passwords for postgres database are stored
> > > in plain text in scripts. (lets assume, perl,
> > > not a compiled language)
> > >
> >
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Huynh, Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 2:16 AM
> Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Intro/Win9X
>
> > Well, is there NT version for evaluation?
>
> Well, there's no PostgreSQL evaluation.
Robert wrote:
> Hi,
> one of the important factors that contributed to the popularity and success of
> Apache, Perl, Tcl/Tk etc. was their platform independence. I'm big fan of Unix (and
> even bigger of Postgres ;-), but BeOS, MacOS X, even Win2000 all look quite
> interesting too and I don't wa
16 matches
Mail list logo
