On 17 apr 2011, at 13:43, pasman pasmański wrote:
> Maybe you think about WITH queries?
>
> 2011/4/17, Robert J.C. Ivens :
>>
>> On 17 apr 2011, at 13:21, Leif Biberg Kristensen wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday 17 April 2011 13:01:45 Robert J.C. Ivens wrote:
>&g
On 17 apr 2011, at 13:21, Leif Biberg Kristensen wrote:
> On Sunday 17 April 2011 13:01:45 Robert J.C. Ivens wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am not sure if there ever was a feature request for using defined column
>> aliases in the rest of a query. This would make queries with
Hi,
I am not sure if there ever was a feature request for using defined column
aliases in the rest of a query.
This would make queries with a lot of logic in those aliased columns a lot
smaller and this easier to write/debug.
I already know you can use the following syntax:
SELECT col1, col2,
