Craig Ringer wrote:
Distributed transactions will give you atomicity if done right - with
two-phase commit (2PC) - but AFAIK will *NOT* give you consistency
across the databases in question.
That's useful to know -- thanks. At least now I know my idea won't
work, so I can forget about it and
Hello,
I am interested in creating a system where Java EE distributed
transactions would work with multiple Postgres databases. I'm having
some difficulty understanding the transaction isolation guarantees that
I would get from this configuration. Can I make my distributed
transactions SERI
