#x27;t map nicely to those higher level types.
Patrick
On 1/17/07, Chad Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/17/07, Patrick Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Certainly support for the GUID field type itself is most important.
> As for the generators, though they are
While using third party modules is not really a barrier for people
deep in the PostgreSQL world, here is what I would need to do to use
GUIDs today.
1. Get a set of GUID/UUID patches (there seem to be many) and
recompile the necessary code.
2. Do the same thing for Windows, assuming that the pa
Greetings all. I've been poking around the web and trying to track
the status of the GUID/UUID patches. In the todo list, that item is
not marked as going into 8.3, and I feel this is unfortunate.
Searching google for "postgresql guid -guide" comes up with around
200,000 hits. It's obviously b
unit tests remove all contents and schema within the
database before starting, and they remove the tables they create as
they proceed. Certainly there are many things have been recently
deleted.
Patrick
On 1/11/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Patrick Earl" <[
reate database command using pgadmin. We are logging into
PostgreSQL as the same user.
Patrick
On 1/11/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Patrick Earl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2007-01-11 09:56:17 ERROR: could not open relation 1663/16403/16426:
>
Hi all. I'm getting a checkpoint request failed message when I try to
execute a CREATE DATABASE command. Since it was a fresh install, I've
included the entire server log up to the point of the error. I
truncated the log output two lines after the error message.
Is there a way I can avoid this
